04/11/2008
Archived Important Online Discussions
Quick response to should business be allowed to turn away business due to sexual orientation
04/08/2008-Quick response to atheist assuming that days of old are better then today 04/11/2008-Quick response to should a business be allowed to turn away business in context of recent NM Christian photographer fined $6,637.94 for sexual orientation discrimination. 04/13/2008-Quick response to name calling of homosexuals in context of recent NM Christian photographer fined $6,637.94 for sexual orientation discrimination. 04/14/2008-Quick response to concerns of a homosexual More to be added...
|
I reviewed this, also, for I have a business and I am sure I serve those of the gay community at times knowingly and at times unknowingly but my business is like a restaurant. The nature of my business doesn't in anyway promote a lifestyle that I am in moral conflict with. Whereas a photographer is going to have their pictures being used to promote a certain lifestyl that they have moral issues with. And so I do believe the moral issue is valid in this case. Their business name will be on those pictures and she will have to view and photograph something that they are in moral conflict with. If we follow your logic then a pro-life photographer if requested to photograph a pro-choice gathering of some sort would be forced to photograph it and I see a distinction between a restaurant and a photo studio. A photo studio is more active in the promotion and development of whatever it is photographing whereas a restaurant is not.
Anyways, take care __________________
"He said, "He who is not for Me is against Me," Just so you know where He's coming from."-Bob Dylan (Gonna Change My Way of Thinking) insurasoul.com Last edited by Timotheus : 4 Days Ago at 03:51 PM. |
